Limited technology helps to deliver ‘e-Learning’ in a developing country

References and Notes

  1. J. Dewey, Experience and education (New York: Collier Macmillan, 1938).
  2. I. Jung, and C. Latchem, A model for e-education: Extended teaching spaces and extended learning spaces. British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol 42 No 1, 2011, pp. 6–18.
  3. A. Gunasekaran, R.D. McNeil, and D. Shaul, E-learning: research and applications. Industrial and Commercial Training, 34, 2, 2002, 44–53.
  4. S. Alexander, E-learning developments and experiences. Education & Training, 43, 4/5, 2001, 240–248.
  5. A. Bork, Personal computers for education (New York: Harper & Row, 1985).
  6. A. Bain, and K. Ross, School reengineering and SAT-1 performance: A case study. International Journal of Education Reform, 9(2), 1999, 148–153.
  7. CEO Forum on Education and Technology, The CEO Forum school technology and readiness report: Key building blocks for student achievement in the 21st century (2001). Retrieved May 10, 2006 from http://www.ceoforum.org/downloads/report4.pdf.
  8. J. Sivin-Kachala, and E.R. Bialo, Research report on the effectiveness of technology in schools, 2000, Washington, DC: Software and Information Industry Association.
  9. C.J. Bonk, and K. Zhang, Empowering online learning: 100+ activities for reading, reflecting, displaying, and doing. (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2008).
  10. D.H. Jonassen, J.Howland, and R.M. Marra, Meaningful learning with technology, 3rd Ed., (Columbus, OH: Merrill/Prentice Hall, 2007).
  11. P. Freire, Pedagogy of the oppressed (New York: Continuum, 1970).
  12. J. Bruner, Toward a theory of instruction (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1966).
  13. T.M. Duffy, and D. Jonassen, Constructivism and the technology of instruction: a conversation (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1992).
  14. P.A. Ertmer, Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 1999, 47–61.
  15. K.F. Hew, and T. Brush, Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Education Tech Research Dev, 55, 2007, 223–252.
  16. J.R. Hill, and M.J. Hannafin, Teaching and Learning in Digital Environments: The Resurgence of Resource-Based Learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, Vol. 49, No. 3, 2001, pp. 37-52.
  17. M.J. Hannafin, J.R. Hill, and S.M. Land, Student-centered learning and interactive multimedia: Status, issues, and implications. Contemporary Education, 68(2),1997, 94-99.
  18. P. Freire, Pedagogy of the oppressed: New revised 20th anniversary edition. (New York: Continuum, 1993).
  19. C.M. Reigeluth, and K. Squire, Emerging work on the new paradigm of instructional theories. Educational Technology, 38 (4), 1998, 41-47.
  20. W.E.Segall, and A.E. Wilson, (1998). Learning and teaching in the classroom, in W.E. Segall and A.E. Wilson, Introduction to education: Teaching in a diverse society, (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill, 1998) 151-170.
  21. J.R. Hill, A conceptual framework for under-standing information seeking in open-ended information systems. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47 (1),1999a, 5-28.
  22. D, Chandler, (1999). Semiotics for beginners [online]. Available:http://www.argyroneta.com/s4b/.
  23. R.E. Mayer, and R. Moreno, Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38, 2003, 43–52.
  24. J.M. Clark, and A. Paivio, Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review, 3, 1991, 149– 210.
  25. R. Moreno, and A. Valdez, Cognitive Load and Learning Effects of Having Students Organize Pictures and Words in Multimedia Environments: The Role of Student Interactivity and Feedback. Education Technology Research & Development, Vol. 53, No. 3, 2005, pp. 35–45.
  26. S. Kalyuga, P. Chandler, and J. Sweller, Managing split-attention and redundancy in multimedia instruction. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, 1999, 351–371.
  27. J.J.G. van Merriënboer, and P. Ayres, Research on cognitive load theory and its design implications for e-learning. [This special issue]. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53 (3), 2005, 5–13.
  28. S. Cairncross, and M. Mannion, Interactive multimedia and learning: Realizing the benefits. Innovation in Education and Teaching International, 38(2), 2001, 156–164.
  29. N.A. Stanton, L. J. Porter, and R. Stroud, Bored with point and click? Theoretical perspectives on designing learning environments. Innovation in Education and Teaching International, 38(2), 2001, 175–182.
  30. R.E. Mayer, and P, Chandler, When learning is just a click away: Does simple user interaction foster deeper understanding of multimedia messages? Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 2001, 390–397.
  31. G. Salomon, No distribution without individuals‟ cognition, in G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations, (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1993) 111–138).
  32. Iowa Department of Education. A guide to developing higher-order thinking across the curriculum. Des Moines, IA (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED306 550, 1989, p.7).
  33. G. Kearsley, and B. Shneiderman, Engagement theory: A framework for technology-based teaching and learning. Educational Technology, September–October, 1998, 20–23.
  34. D.C. Naik, and V. Teelock, Enhancing the Teaching and Learning of History and Geography through Information and Communications Technology: A Mauritian Experience. Educational Technology Research and Development. Vol.54, Issue 4, 2006, 422 – 434.
  35. D. Kellner, New media and new literacies: Reconstructing education for the new millennium. [online]. http://www.gseis.ucla.edu/courses/ed253a/kellner/newmedia.html, 2000.
  36. D.M. Kennedy, and C. McNaught, Principles of good teaching and interactive multimedia design. [online] http://ultibase.rmit.edu.au/Articles/dec97/kenne1.html, 1997.
  37. L.C. Sarasin, Learning styles perspectives: Impact in the classroom (Madison, WI: Atwood Publishing, 1999).
  38. G.B. Shelly, G.A. Waggoner, T.J. Cashman, and W.C. Waggoner, Discovering computers 98: A link to the future (Boston: Course Technology, Inc, 1998, September).
  39. R.G. Tharp, and R. Gallimore, A theory of teaching as assisted performance, in P. Light, S. Sheldon, and M. Woodhead (Eds.), Learning to think: Child development in social context, Vol. 2, (London: Routledge, 1991) 42–61.
  40. A. Collins, J.S. Brown, and S.E. Newman, Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading, writing, and mathematics, in L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser, (Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1990) 453–494.
  41. C.J. Bonk, and D.J. Cunningham, Searching for learner-centered, constructivist, and socio cultural components of collaborative educational learning tools, in C. J. Bonk and K. S. King (Eds.), Electronic collaborators: Learner-centered technologies for literacy, apprenticeship, and discourse, (Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 1998) 25–50.
  42. C.J. Bonk, N. Hara, V. Dessen, S. Malikowski, and L. Supplee, We‟re in TITLE to dream: Envisioning a community of practice, „The Intraplanetary Teacher Learning Exchange.‟. Cyber psychology & Behavior, 3, 2000, 25–39, doi:10.1089/109493100316201.
  43. D. Christophel, The relationship among teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation, and learning. Communication Education, 39(4), 1990, 323–340.
  44. M. Weiner, and A. Mehrabian, Language within language: Immediacy, a channel in verbal communication (New York: Appleton- Century-Crofts, 1968).
  45. R. LaRose, and P. Whitten, Re-thinking instructional immediacy for Web courses: A social cognitive exploration. Communication Education, 49(4), 2000, 320–338.
  46. T.C. Reeves, and P.M. Reeves, The effective dimensions of interactive learning on the www, in B. H. Khan (Ed.), Web-based instruction, (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications, 1997) 59–66.
  47. S.P. Lajoie, Computers as cognitive tools: no more walls, 2 (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2000).
  48. C.S. Rigby, E.L. Deci, B.C. Patrick, and R.M. Ryan, Beyond the intrinsic-extrinsic dichotomy: Self-determination in motivation and learning. Motivation and Emotion, 16(3), 1992, 165–185.
  49. F.M. Newmann, Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools (New York: Teachers College Press, 1992).
  50. J. Gilbert, S. Morton, and J. Rowley, e-Learning: The student experience. British Journal of Educational Technology Vol 38 No 4, 2007, 560–573.
  51. C.P. Lim, Effective integration of ICT in Singapore schools: pedagogical and policy implications. Education Tech Research Dev, 55, 2007, 83–116.
  52. S-K. Wang, and T.C. Reeves, The effects of a web-based learning environment on student motivation in a high school earth science course. Education Technology Research and Development, 55, 2007, 169–192.
  53. D.A. Bergin, (1999). Influences on classroom interest. Educational Psychologist, 34(2), 1999, 87–98.
  54. D.L. Lowther, S.M. Ross, and G.M. Morrison, When Each One Has One: The Influences on Teaching Strategies and Student Achievement of Using Laptops in the Classroom. Educational Technology Research &Development. Vol. 51, No. 3 , (2003), 23–44.
  55. M.W. Lipsey, and D.B. Wilson, The efficacy of psychological, educational, and behavioral treatment: confirmation from meta- analysis. American Journal of Psychology, 48, 12, 1993, 1181– 1209.
  56. C.M. Fletcher-Flinn, and B. Gravatt, The efficacy of computer-based instruction (CAI): a meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12, 3, 1995, 219–242.
  57. J.M. Parr, A review of the literature on computer-assisted learning, particularly integrated learning systems, and outcomes with respect to literacy and numeracy (Updated October 10, 2005). Retrieved November 11, 2005, from http://www.minedu.govt.nz/index.cfm?layoutdocument&documentid5499&CFID. 2005.
  58. C. Harrison, E.A. Lunzer, P. Tymms, C. Taylor Fitz-Gibbon, and J. Restorick, Use of ICT and its relationship with performance in examinations: a comparison of the ImpaCT2 project‟s research findings using pupil-level, school-level and multilevel modeling data. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20, 2004, 319–337.
  59. J. Hartley, Teaching, learning and new technology: a review for teachers. British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 38, No 1, 2007, 42–62.